Debunking Common Assumptions in Analytics: A Whiteboard Friday Discussion
Debunking Common Assumptions in Analytics: A Whiteboard Friday Discussion

Debunking Common Assumptions in Analytics: A Whiteboard Friday Discussion


In today’s data-driven world, analytics plays a crucial role in shaping business decisions. However, it is essential to differentiate between accurate insights and assumptions that can hinder progress. In this blog post, we aim to debunk common assumptions in analytics, drawing inspiration from a recent Whiteboard Friday discussion. By questioning these assumptions, we can foster a more rigorous and effective approach to data analysis.

Assumption 1: Correlation implies causation

One of the most common misconceptions in analytics is assuming that correlation between two variables automatically implies causation. While a correlation suggests a relationship between variables, it does not prove causation. It is crucial to conduct further analysis and domain-specific research to establish causality accurately. Failing to do so may lead to inaccurate conclusions and faulty decision-making.

Assumption 2: More data equates to better insights

While it is true that having a larger dataset can potentially provide more precise insights, the assumption that more data always leads to better results is flawed. The quality and relevance of data are equally important as its quantity. Collecting large volumes of irrelevant or low-quality data can introduce noise and hinder the clarity of analysis. It is vital to determine the right metrics and collect data aligned with the specific objectives of the analysis.

Assumption 3: Outliers are always errors

Outliers are data points that deviate significantly from the norm. Many analytics professionals assume that outliers are errors and should be eliminated or adjusted to maintain accuracy. However, outliers can often provide valuable insights and reveal patterns or anomalies that are critical to understanding the underlying data. Instead of immediately discarding outliers, it is important to investigate and determine their significance to the analysis.

Assumption 4: A single metric tells the whole story

Sometimes, analytics teams tend to rely heavily on a single metric to measure success or make decisions. This assumption can prove to be misleading, as using just one metric may overlook essential nuances and hidden trends in the data. The key lies in defining an appropriate set of metrics that collectively capture the desired outcome and provide a comprehensive perspective for analysis.

Assumption 5: Analytics gives definite answers

Analytics is often regarded as a tool that provides definitive answers. However, it is crucial to understand that analytics is an iterative process. Data analysis only presents insights based on available data and models. Constant reevaluation and adaptation are necessary as new information comes to light. Embracing uncertainty and acknowledging the limitations of analytics are important to ensure more accurate and reliable results.


By challenging common assumptions in analytics, we can elevate the quality and effectiveness of data analysis. It is essential to distinguish between correlation and causation, prioritize data quality over quantity, embrace outliers as potential sources of valuable insights, use a diverse set of metrics, and acknowledge the limitations of analytics. By doing so, we can make better-informed decisions and drive meaningful impact within organizations.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *